What happened: Each legislative session, lawmakers add new requirements for public schools. Some are small, like posting notices or submitting reports. Others come with significant ongoing costs.

The Texas Association of School Boards (TASB) and Texas Association of School Administrators (TASA) publish a biennial Report on School District Mandates, last updated in December 2024. The report includes mandates dating back to the mid-1990s and highlights cost drivers that districts must absorb without a dedicated funding source.

Why it matters: District leaders often cite “unfunded mandates” to argue that schools need more money. But not all mandates are equal. Some, such as safety officers on every campus or expanded dyslexia screenings, create new, recurring costs. Others, like class size limits or gifted-and-talented programs, are decades old and now fully built into district operations.

The real question is how much of the financial burden comes from the mandates themselves, and how much depends on how districts choose to implement them.

Midland’s top stories. One quick email. Free, every Friday.
Get Midland Wrapped, our free weekly email for busy Midland residents. Each Friday, we break down the week’s most important local stories — what happened, why it matters, and what to watch next — so you can stay informed without the noise.

The big picture:

  • Long-standing mandates: The 22-to-one teacher-to-student class size ratio in grades PK–4, fine arts credit requirements, and annual training for gifted-and-talented teachers have been in place for decades. Districts have adjusted staffing and budgets around them.
  • Recent high-cost mandates: Armed security officers on every campus, silent panic alert technology, universal dyslexia screening for all K–1 students (expanded in 2023), and fentanyl abuse prevention lessons for grades 6–12.
  • Cost factors: Districts comply in various ways, including hiring staff, reassigning duties, contracting out services, purchasing technology, or paying for training.

Go deeper: Mandates generally fall into five broad categories:

  • Instructional programs: accelerated instruction for students who fail the State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness (STAAR), dyslexia screenings, gifted-and-talented programs, and personal graduation plans
  • Human resources: Teacher Retirement System surcharges for rehired retirees, expanded leave policies, and required background checks
  • Student health and safety: Automated external defibrillators on every campus, medication protocols, food allergy policies, and fentanyl prevention instruction
  • School safety: armed security officers on each campus, panic alert systems, emergency operations plans, and safety audits
  • Reporting and notices: Truancy prevention reports, campus report cards, budget and tax rate notices, annual debt disclosures, trustee access to district information, and budget line items for required public notice

What they’re saying: Midland ISD trustee Matt Friez described mandates as “rules handed down by the state of Texas and federal government without the funding to pay for them.” He said, “If Austin and Washington are going to demand more from our schools, they should also be willing to pay for it.”

The other side: Critics argue that districts often overstate the “unfunded” label. David Hamilton, a former trustee of Fort Bend ISD, said, “The ‘underfunded’ narrative is consistently used to justify local tax increases and calls for increased state funding while also being used to excuse low performance.”

Texas Policy Research makes a similar point. “School funding in Texas has steadily increased over the years, and the narrative of chronic underfunding is misleading. The real challenge is ensuring those resources are allocated effectively to improve outcomes.”

Reality check: No matter whether dollars flow through the state, the federal government, or the district, they are still taxpayer dollars. Shifting responsibility from one level of government to another does not change the fact that citizens ultimately pay the bill.

The bottom line: Not every mandate is an “unfunded” burden. The TASB/TASA report itself notes that many mandates are long-standing and already factored into district budgets. Costs also vary by district design, whether they hire new staff, reassign existing roles, or outsource services.

In other words, mandates don’t affect all districts equally, and implementation choices matter as much as the rules themselves. Understanding that helps separate rhetoric from reality.